YANGI SAYLOV ISLOHATLARI YOXUD JAHON TAJRIBASIDA SINALGAN TIZIM
Keywords:
Kalit so'zlar: Saylov islohoti, mutanosib vakillik, tanlangan ovoz berish, demokratik tizimlar, saylov inklyuzivligi, aralash a'zolarning mutanosib tizimi.Abstract
Annotatsiya. Ushbu maqola so'nggi saylov islohotlarini ko'rib chiqadi va demokratik jarayonlarni kuchaytirish uchun global sharoitda sinovdan o'tgan tizimlarni baholaydi. Germaniya, AQSh va Hindiston kabi mamlakatlarning vakillik misollariga e'tibor qaratib, ushbu hujjat ularning tegishli saylov tizimlarini tahlil qiladi, masalan, mutanosib vakillik, tanlangan ovoz berish va aralash a'zolarning mutanosib vakili. Tadqiqot ushbu tizimlarning qiyinchiliklari va muvaffaqiyatlarini ta'kidlaydi va siyosiy inklyuzivlik va vakillikni oshirish uchun saylov jarayonlarini isloh qilishga intilayotgan mamlakatlar uchun siyosiy tavsiyalar beradi.
References
1. Aardal, B., 2002. Electoral systems in Norway. I B. Grofman & A. Lijphart (red. The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries. Agathon Press, New York, pp. 167–224.
2. Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C.M., Mathiasen, A., Petersen, N.B.G., 2019. The role of evidence in politics: motivated reasoning and persuasion among politicians. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 1–24.
3. Banducci, S.A., Karp, J.A., 1999. Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation. Polit. Behav. 21 (3), 217–238.
4. Carey, J.M., Hix, S., 2011. The electoral sweet spot: low-magnitude proportional electoral systems. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55 (2), 383–397.
5. Klar, S., 2013. The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. J. Polit. 75 (4), 1108–1124.
6. Reynolds, A., 2011. Designing Democracy in a Dangerous World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Sheffer, L., Loewen, P.J., Soroka, S., Walgrave, S., Sheafer, T., 2018. Non-representative representatives: an experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 112 (2), 302–321.
