LINGUA DIDACTICS APPROACHES IN THE CREDIT-MODULE SYSTEM

Mualliflar

  • Luiza Khaknazarova Abdulovna ##default.groups.name.author##

##semicolon##

Keywords: lingua didactics, Credit-Module System, language education, modular curriculum, student-centered learning

Abstrak

This article explores the integration of lingua didactics approaches within the Credit-Module System (CMS) in higher education, emphasizing their potential to enhance language teaching and learning outcomes. Drawing from pedagogical theories and case studies, the research highlights key methods, challenges, and practical applications. Results indicate that lingua didactics strategies tailored to CMS significantly improve student engagement and performance. The findings underscore the necessity for lingua didactics innovation in modular curriculum design to foster effective language education.

##submission.citations##

1. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

2. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

3. Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2012). The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1

5. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

6. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.

7. Johnson, K. E. (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587936

8. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.

9. Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.319

10. Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.

11. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Language curriculum design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

12. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

13. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

14. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.

15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

16. Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford University Press.

17. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

18. Yule, G. (2016). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

19. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

20. Zorica, M., & Janković, A. (2017). E-learning systems in higher education: Credit-module framework. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 13(1), 31–48

Nashr qilingan

2024-12-04

##submission.howToCite##

LINGUA DIDACTICS APPROACHES IN THE CREDIT-MODULE SYSTEM. (2024). Лучшие интеллектуальные исследования, 34(1), 276-280. https://scientific-jl.org/luch/article/view/4575