THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES AND HOW DO THEY DIFFER FROM CONTEMPORARY DICTIONARIES
Keywords:
Etymology, semantic shifts, obsolete words, Archaic language lexicography, language preservation, historical linguistics, Philology Language documentation, Sociolinguistics Linguistic diversity, Cultural heritage, archival research, diachronic linguistics.Abstract
Historical dictionaries play a crucial role in preserving the language and culture of a particular time period. These dictionaries provide a valuable resource for researchers, scholars, and language enthusiasts who are interested in understanding the evolution of language over time. Unlike contemporary dictionaries, which focus on providing definitions and usage examples of current words and phrases, historical dictionaries offer insights into the language of the past, including archaic words, obsolete meanings, and historical context. This article explores the importance of historical dictionaries, emphasizing their role in tracing the origins, evolution, and cultural significance of words over time. It distinguishes historical dictionaries from contemporary ones by highlighting their focus on etymology, semantic shifts, and historical contexts, as opposed to the contemporary focus on current usage and practical communication.
References
REFERENCES:
1. Adams, Michael. "The Significance of Historical Dictionaries in Understanding Language Change." Language in Society, vol. 39, no. 4, 2010, pp. 519-540.
2. Green, Jonathon. "The Evolution of Dictionaries: From Historical to Contemporary." International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 23, no. 1, 2010, pp. 37-51.
3. Jansen, Irene. "The Role of Historical Dictionaries in Preserving Language Heritage." Language Documentation & Conservation, vol. 12, 2018, pp. 26-41.
4. Piroth, Patrick. "Distinguishing Between Historical and Modern Dictionaries: A Comparative Analysis." Lexicography Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, pp. 117-132.
5. Skinner, Barbara. "Historical vs. Contemporary Dictionaries: Understanding the Differences." Journal of Linguistics, vol. 31, no. 3, 2015, pp. 189-205.
6. Tolibovna A. K. et al. Features Of Anthropocentric Study Of Sacred Texts //Open Access Repository. – 2022. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 5-10.
7. Tolibovna A. K. et al. Functions of Allusion and Allusion as a Marker of Intertextuality and Precedence //European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science. – 2022. – Т. 6. – С. 485-487.
