CRITIQUES OF SAPIR'S THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES. HIS METHODS' SHORTCOMINGS AND HOW THEY AFFECT CURRENT RESEARCH
Ключевые слова:
Edward Sapir, Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, linguistic relativity, language and thought, linguistic determinism, cognitive processes, sociolinguistics, cultural bias, qualitative methods, empirical validation, interdisciplinary research, modern linguistics.Аннотация
Edward Sapir's influential work in linguistics and anthropology, particularly his formulation of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis regarding linguistic relativity, has significantly shaped the study of language and cognition. However, his theories and methodologies have been subject to considerable critique over time. Notable criticisms include the absence of empirical support for his assertions, an oversimplified view of the connection between language and thought, and potential cultural biases in his analyses. Furthermore, his heavy reliance on qualitative research methods has been criticized for lacking the rigor associated with contemporary mixed-methods approaches. Modern research has evolved towards a more nuanced interpretation of linguistic relativity, conceptualizing it as a spectrum rather than as a deterministic model. Developments in interdisciplinary research methods and empirical studies have addressed various shortcomings in Sapir's original work, highlighting the significance of sociolinguistic and contextual influences on language use. Although Sapir's theories continue to serve as a foundational reference, they are now scrutinized within a more comprehensive and critical framework, ensuring their ongoing relevance in discussions surrounding the relationship between language, thought, and culture
Библиографические ссылки
REFERENCES.
1. Iwamoto, K. (2005). Critiques of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: Context and Language Use. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(2), 245-268.
2. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow and Company.
3. Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
4. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited by J. B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 1-29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language, Culture, and Thought: The Evidence from Whorfianism. In: S. C. Levinson (Ed.), Language and Culture (pp. 46-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How Language Shapes Thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62-65.
