ECONOMETRICS IN RISK ASSESSMENT IN FINANCIAL MARKETS: USING VALUE AT RISK (VAR) AND OTHER METHODS

Авторы

  • Qarshiboyev Xayrullo Qilichovich Автор
  • Xudoyberdiyeva Maftuna Zayniddin qizi Автор

Ключевые слова:

Econometrics, risk assessment, financial markets, Value at Risk (VaR), Conditional VaR (CVaR), Monte Carlo simulation, variance-covariance method, stress testing, financial risk management, econometric models.

Аннотация

The increasing complexity of financial markets and the need for effective risk management strategies have led to the widespread use of econometric models to assess and mitigate risk. This article explores the role of econometrics in financial risk assessment, focusing on the application of the Value at Risk (VaR) methodology and other complementary techniques. VaR has become a standard tool for quantifying potential financial losses over a specific time horizon with a given level of confidence. The article examines various methods for estimating VaR, including historical simulation, variance-covariance, and Monte Carlo simulation, and discusses their strengths and limitations. Additionally, it investigates other risk management models, such as Conditional VaR (CVaR) and stress testing, to provide a comprehensive approach to risk assessment. By analyzing the applications of these models in real-world financial markets, this article highlights the importance of econometrics in understanding and managing financial risks, particularly in volatile and uncertain market conditions.

Биографии авторов

  • Qarshiboyev Xayrullo Qilichovich

    Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service,
     Head of the Department of “Higher Mathematics”,
    Associate Professor, PhD.
    karshiboyev@mail.ru

  • Xudoyberdiyeva Maftuna Zayniddin qizi

     Master's degree of the
    Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service

Библиографические ссылки

REFERENCES:

1. Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

2. Dowd, K. (2005). Measuring Market Risk (2nd ed.). Wiley.

3. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton University Press.

4. Christoffersen, P. F. (2003). Elements of Financial Risk Management. Academic Press.

5. RiskMetrics Group. (2000). RiskMetrics Technical Document: The Measurement and Control of Risk. J.P. Morgan.

6. Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events: For Insurance and Finance. Springer.

7. Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 145-166.

8. Hull, J. C. (2017). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

9. Pritsker, M. (2001). The Hidden Risks of Value at Risk: A Review of the Literature. Financial Analysts Journal, 57(6), 63-70.

10. Berkowitz, J., & O'Brien, J. (2002). How Accurate are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks?. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1093-1111.

Опубликован

2024-12-12

Как цитировать

ECONOMETRICS IN RISK ASSESSMENT IN FINANCIAL MARKETS: USING VALUE AT RISK (VAR) AND OTHER METHODS. (2024). Modern Education and Development, 16(2), 146-154. https://scientific-jl.org/mod/article/view/5713