THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION ON LANGUAGE STYLE
Ключевые слова:
social media, grammar, communication, abbreviation, digital communication, language style, emojis, hashtags, vocabulary.Аннотация
With an emphasis on how platforms like social media, text messaging, and online forums impact modern communication practices, this article investigates the impact of digital communication on linguistic style. New linguistic standards, abbreviations, and tone changes have resulted from the evolution of language use brought about by the emergence of digital technologies. The study looks at how digital media affect vocabulary, grammar, and communication structure, emphasizing how informality, brevity, and immediacy shape language style.The research also explores how these changes affect language preservation, cultural norms, and interpersonal relationships. By examining both qualitative and quantitative data, the study highlights how language remains dynamic in the digital era and provides insights into how people's self-expression is still influenced by digital communication.
Библиографические ссылки
REFERENCES
1. Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185-205. 2. Baron, N.S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press. 3. Baym, N.K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Polity Press. 4. Bender, E.M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5185-5198. 5. Birhane, A. (2021). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), 100205. 6. Blommaert, J. (2018). Durkheim and the Internet: On sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. Bloomsbury Academic. 7. boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. 8. Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. 9. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10. Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing. 11. Danet, B., & Herring, S.C. (2007). The multilingual internet: Language, culture, and communication online. Oxford University Press.
12. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Blackwell. 13. Evans, V. (2017). The emoji code: The linguistics behind smiley faces and scaredy cats. Picador. 14. Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New techniques in online research: Challenges for research ethics. 20th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR), Milwaukee. 15. Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. 16. Graham, M., & Hogan, B. (2020). Digital divides and the future of linguistic diversity. Internet Policy Review, 9(1), 1-19.
17.Teshaboyeva, N. Z. (2019). TEACHING ENGLISH THROUGH LITERATURE INTESL AND TEFL CLASSROOMS. In СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ: АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ, ДОСТИЖЕНИЯ И ИННОВАЦИИ (pp. 82-84).
18.Хидирова, Д., & Тешабоева, Н. (2022). Pedagogical conditions for the development of the healthy thinking in students. Zamonaviy innovatsion tadqiqotlarning dolzarb muammolari va rivojlanish tendensiyalari: yechimlar va istiqbollar, 1(1), 120-122.
19.Gaybullayeva, N. D. K., & Kizi, T. N. Z. (2022). THE ROLE OF INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN TEACHING LANGUAGE LEARNERS FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND MAINLY ENGLISH. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS), 2(10), 8-10.
20.Teshaboyeva Nafisa Zubaydulla qizi, Jurayev Muhammadrahim Murod o’g’li, & Mamirova Munisa Rajab qizi. (2021). Language Learning Culturally and the Role of Literature in Teaching Process. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 2(3), 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.cajotas.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJOTAS/article/view/84
21.Ma’ripov J. K. A BRIEF INFORMATION ABOUT TENSES //OʻZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI OLIY VA OʻRTA. – С. 464.
22.Tolibovna A. K. et al. Features Of Anthropocentric Study Of Sacred Texts //Open Access Repository. – 2022. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 5-10.
23.Tolibovna A. K. et al. Functions of Allusion and Allusion as a Marker of Intertextuality and Precedence //European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science. – 2022. – Т. 6. – С. 485-487.
24.Ma’ripov J. KORPUS HAQIDA UMUMIY TUSHUNCHA //Центральноазиатский журнал образования и инноваций. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 175-178.
25.Ma’ripov J. Antroposentrizm–tilshunoslikning zamonaviy yonalishi sifatida //Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 28. – С. 62-68.
26.Solnyshkina M. I. et al. IMPORTANCE OF SETTING GOALS. SMART GOALS //Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 11. – С. 318-320.
27.LEARNER I. Jizzakh branch of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, The faculty of psychology, The teacher at the department of Foreign languages.
28.Маърипов Д. Psychological value of the novels by agatha christie //Информатика и инженерные технологии. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 630-632.
