COMMUNICATION STYLE

Mualliflar

  • Zahro Mamadaliyeva ##default.groups.name.author##
  • Nigora Ne'matullayeva ##default.groups.name.author##

##semicolon##

Key words: Verbal communication, Non-verbal communication, Tone, Body language, Adaptability, Context, Audience, Active listening, Cultural influences

Abstrak

Abstract: Communication style refers to the characteristic ways individuals convey, interpret, and respond to information in interactions. It encompasses verbal and non-verbal elements, tone, pace, and the choice of words, as well as cultural, social, and psychological factors influencing how messages are delivered and understood. Commonly identified styles include assertive, passive, aggressive, and passive-aggressive, each impacting interpersonal dynamics, workplace effectiveness, and personal relationships differently. Understanding and adapting communication styles enhances clarity, reduces misunderstandings, and fosters more constructive, empathetic exchanges. Research emphasizes that effective communicators often adjust their style to suit context and audience, promoting inclusivity and engagement in various settings. This adaptability is crucial for leadership, teamwork, and conflict resolution, underscoring the role of communication style as a cornerstone of human interaction and relational success.

##submission.citations##

1. Bolton, R. (1986). People Skills: How to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others, and Resolve Conflicts. Simon & Schuster.

2. Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. PuddleDancer Press.

3. Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Ballantine Books.

4. Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2011). Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High. McGraw-Hill.

5. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.

Nashr qilingan

2024-11-15

##submission.howToCite##

Zahro Mamadaliyeva, & Nigora Ne'matullayeva. (2024). COMMUNICATION STYLE. PEDAGOGS, 69(2), 98-100. https://scientific-jl.org/ped/article/view/2876