THE ROLE OF CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND THE MECHANISM OF ACTION

Authors

  • Shaxnoza Anvarovna Kuchkarova Author

Keywords:

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease, glomerulosclerosis, calcium channel blockers, remodeling, dihydropyridine, lercanidipine.

Abstract

At  the  end  of  the  20th  and  the  beginning  of  the  21st  century,  the  global 
community faced a worldwide issue that is not only medical but also has significant 
socio-economic implications — the pandemic of chronic diseases. Chronic conditions 
such as diabetes, heart, lung, and kidney diseases, as well as their various combinations, 
are  now  observed  in  nearly  every  individual.  High-tech  intensive  and  replacement 
therapies can save lives, but they do not always ensure the preservation of life quality, 
work  capacity,  and  social  activity.  Moreover,  simple  and  affordable  preventive 
measures are often underutilized, diseases are diagnosed late, and patients frequently 
lack motivation and commitment to a healthy lifestyle.   
Early clinical and laboratory signs of kidney damage are often vague and go 
unnoticed by physicians, particularly in elderly patients. These initial symptoms are 
often perceived as part of the "age norm."   
Among  chronic  non-communicable  diseases,  chronic  kidney  disease  (CKD) 
occupies a special place due to its high prevalence, significant reduction in quality of 
life,  and  high  mortality  rates.  At  its  terminal  stage,  CKD  necessitates  expensive 
treatments such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. However, none of the existing 
kidney replacement therapies are flawless: they fail to fully restore kidney function and 
carry the risk of complications.   

References

References:

1. А.М.Шилов.Первый московский государственный медицинский

университет им. И.М.Сеченова.» Местоблокаторов кальциевых каналов

третьего поколения в континууме метаболического синдрома.

Антигипертензивная терапия.Трудный пациент №4 ТОМ,12, 2014.20-21стр.

2. А.М. Шутов Хроническая болезнь почек — глобальная проблема XXI века,

2014 удк 616.61-036.12. Клиническая медицина, № 5, 2014 7стр.

3. Бубнова М.Г. Антагонисты кальция и нефропротекция: современное

положение и перспекти-вы препарата нового поколения лерканидипина/

М.Г. Бубнова // CardioСоматика. ― 2011. ― № 3. – С. 46-50.

4. О.Н.Сигитова.»Современные клинические рекомендации по лечению

артериальной гипертензии у пациентов с хронической болезнью почек».г.

Казань.Консилиум.№ 1 (151) январь – февраль, 2017.23стр.

5. Сиренко, Ю.Н. Дигидропиридиновые антагонисты кальция – новый резерв

снижения риска осложнений при артериальной гипертензии/ Ю.Н. Сиренко

// Артериальная гипертензия. ― 2010. ― № 9.

http://medstrana.com/articles/4010//

6. Сливка Н.А. Патоморфологические изменения почек при гепаторенальном

синдроме XLII Международной научно-практической конференции

“Экспериментальные и теоретические исследования в современной науке”

Россия,г.Новосибирск, 26июня 2019г.

7. Шилов Е.М., Смирнов А.В., Козловская Н.Л. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа

Нефрология. Клинические рекомендации. 2016, 816 стр.

8. Blvarez C., Gуmez E., Simуn M. atal. Differences in Lercanidipinesys temic

exposure when administered according to labeling: in fasting state and 15 minutes

before food intake. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012;68: 1043–1047

9. Cepoi V., Onofriescu M., Segall L., Covic A. The prevalence ofchronic kidney

disease in the general population in Romania: a studyon 60,000 persons. Int. Urol.

Nephrol. 2012; 44: 213—20.

10. Chalmers J., Arima H., Harrap S. et al. Global survey of current practice in

management of hypertension as reported by societies affiliated with the

international society ofhypertension. J Hypertens, 2013; Feb 2710. Collins A.J.,

Foley R.N., Herzog C. et al. United States renal data system 2008. Annual data

report. Am. J. KidneyDis. 2009; 53: S1—374.

11. Crews D.C., Plantinga L.C., Miller E.R. etal. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease

in persons with undiagnosed or prehypertension in the United States. Hypertension.

2010; 55: 1102—9.

12. Duru O.K., Vargas R.B., Kermah D. et al. High prevalence of stage 3 chronic

kidney disease in older adults despite normal serum creatinine. J. Gen. Intern. Med.

2009; 24: 86—92.

13. Eggers P.W. Has the incidence of end-stage renal disease in the USAand other

countries stabilized? Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens.2011; 20: 241—5.

14. Farah R.,Khamisy-Farah R., Shurtz-SwirskiR. Calcium channel blocker effect on

insulin resistance and inflammatory markers in essential hypertension patients. Int

Angiol, 2013;32:85–93

15. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of

Chronic Kidney Disease. KidneyInt. Suppl. 2013; 3:1—150.

16. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic

Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification andStratification. Am. J. KidneyDis.

2002; 39 (Suppl 1):S1—266.

17. Rump L. C. Efficacy and tolerability of the fixed lercanidipine-enalapril

combination in thetreatment of patients with essential hypertension. Arzneimittel

for schung, 2010; 60:24–30.

18. Zhang J., Cao H., Zhang Y. et al. Nephroprotective effect of calcium channel

blockers against toxicity of lead exposure in mice. Toxicol Lett, 2013; Feb 18.

Published

2024-12-23

How to Cite

Shaxnoza Anvarovna Kuchkarova. (2024). THE ROLE OF CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND THE MECHANISM OF ACTION . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 35(3), 131-138. https://scientific-jl.org/tal/article/view/7082