THE SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS OF CONTENT INTEGRATED LANGUAGE LEARNING. THE BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING THIS METHOD DURING THE LESSONS

Mualliflar

  • Turdiyeva Zahro Mirsoliyevna ##default.groups.name.author##

##semicolon##

Key Words: Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), language acquisition, interdisciplinary learning, cognitive development, intercultural competence, educational challenges, teaching strategies.

Abstrak

Content  and  Language  Integrated  Learning  (CLIL)  has  emerged  as  a 
transformative  approach  to  education,  combining  the  teaching  of  subject-specific 
content with a foreign language. This paper explores the scientific findings surrounding 
CLIL, highlighting its cognitive, linguistic, and cultural benefits. Furthermore, it delves 
into  the  challenges  faced  by  educators  and  learners  during  its  implementation  in 
classroom settings. By synthesizing recent research, the study emphasizes the role of 
CLIL in enhancing students' communicative competence, fostering critical thinking, 
and  promoting  intercultural  awareness.  Simultaneously,  it  acknowledges  obstacles 
such  as  inadequate  teacher  training,  resource  limitations,  and  varying  learner 
proficiencies. The paper concludes with strategies to address these challenges, ensuring 
effective and inclusive CLIL practices. 

##submission.citations##

References

1. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated

Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

2. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language

Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and

traditional EFL settings: A comparative study. International CLIL Research

Journal, 1(2), 4-17.

4. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and

Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education.

Macmillan Education.

5. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking

stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.

6. Eurydice Report. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at

School in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

7. Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The Roles of Language in

CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of Content and Language

Integrated Learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian

Bilingual Sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418–442.

##submission.downloads##

Nashr qilingan

2024-12-09

##submission.howToCite##

Turdiyeva Zahro Mirsoliyevna. (2024). THE SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS OF CONTENT INTEGRATED LANGUAGE LEARNING. THE BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING THIS METHOD DURING THE LESSONS . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 35(1), 42-49. https://scientific-jl.org/tal/article/view/5180