DEVELOPING ENGLISH TEACHERS' INDEPENDENT LEARNING SKILLS THROUGH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES
Ключевые слова:
Keywords: Metacognitive strategies, English teachers, self-directed learning, professional development.Аннотация
Abstract
The study presents a framework that incorporates metacognitive strategies like
self-regulation, reflection, and strategic planning, acknowledging the critical role that
self-directed learning plays in professional development. Developing English teachers'
independent learning skills is crucial for their ongoing professional growth and the
enhancement of their teaching effectiveness. Metacognitive strategies, which involve
reflecting on one's own thinking processes, can significantly contribute to this
development. These strategies help teachers become more aware of their learning
habits, identify strengths and areas for improvement, and apply effective problem-
solving techniques to overcome challenges.
Библиографические ссылки
References:
1. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated
learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
2. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area
of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-
911.
3. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
4. Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is – What it
is not. Learning and Employability Series 1. Higher Education Academy.
5. Wang, J., Baki, A., & Yang, Y. (2019). The impact of metacognitive
strategies on English teachers' professional development. Educational
Research, 61(2), 164-182.
6. Lamb, T. (2017). The role of independent learning in language teaching.
Language Teaching, 50(4), 553-575.
7. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.
Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
8. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.
D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of
reading research (pp. 353-394). Longman.